Security contests for serious protocol teams.
Launch a high-signal security review contest or bug bounty, get parallel researcher coverage, and ship with validated findings and structured remediation.
Attractive again
Fair contests and bug bounties with clear scope, fair payouts, and a workflow that respects everyone's time.
AI spam proof
Every submission is tied to a real finding and reviewed by human judges. No bulk-generated noise.
Expert coverage
Two Lead Guards are matched to your protocol, backed by a wide field of researchers reviewing in parallel.
Paid on impact
Researchers earn rewards for verified, exploitable findings. You spend on outcomes, not hours.
Meet a Lead Guard pairing.
Every contest is anchored by two senior researchers matched to your protocol. Two perspectives, one record, no quiet downgrades.
Senior smart-contract researcher. Multi-time top finisher across major security review contests, with a track record on DeFi primitives and cross-chain systems.
Solidity, Rust, and CosmWasm specialist. Top 25 on Code4rena over the past year, with 10+ top-10 security review finishes and 130+ validated findings.
The platform, end to end.
From scoping the contest to publishing the leaderboard, every step is transparent and on record.
Contests, scoped up front.
Scope, prize pool, schedule, and lead team all live on one page. Researchers see the full picture before they commit a single hour.
Reputation you can verify.
Guards and judges are ranked by validated findings and rewards, filtered by language and protocol type. Good work is visible, and so is the record behind it.
Profiles that carry the record.
Every researcher has a public profile: rewards, score, validated findings, contests participated, and the protocols they've helped secure. Reputation is portable and on the record.
Beyond the contest.
A complete security path: from pre-launch contests to post-launch bug bounties, plus two specialized programs for teams that need deeper assurance.
After mitigation, teams can launch with a pre-launch bug bounty to keep coverage open right up to mainnet. Every phase is on the same platform, with the same transparent record.
Why protocol teams should choose DualGuard.
Dual & community judging
Every finding is judged in two layers: two Lead Guards anchor the review, and the wider researcher community plus an independent panel weighs in. Severity is agreed on transparently, and disputes are resolved on record.
Matched Lead Guards
Every contest is led by two senior security researchers matched to your protocol's stack and risk profile. They anchor the review and guide the wider researcher field.
Structured remediation
Findings ship with reproduction steps, severity, and a remediation path. Your engineering team gets a plan, not a wall of comments.
Transparent workflows
Payouts, roles, and decisions are published on the contest page. Everyone sees the same information at the same time.
Built for web3 security
Scope, submission, dual and community judging, escalations, payout, continuous coverage.
See DualGuard in action.
Book a live walkthrough. We will scope a contest for your protocol, walk through the researcher and judging flow, and answer anything your team needs before launch.